Author: Matt Taylor
Date: 00:15:15 02/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2003 at 23:26:34, Aaron Gordon wrote: >On February 21, 2003 at 21:51:41, Matt Taylor wrote: > >>On February 21, 2003 at 19:49:55, Aaron Gordon wrote: >> >>>On February 21, 2003 at 18:08:58, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On February 21, 2003 at 17:37:35, Aaron Gordon wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 21, 2003 at 08:04:18, Mike Byrne wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On February 21, 2003 at 08:02:34, Mike Byrne wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On February 21, 2003 at 07:14:47, Charles Worthington wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On February 21, 2003 at 07:05:22, Charles Worthington wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On February 21, 2003 at 06:47:11, Mike Byrne wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On February 21, 2003 at 04:46:53, Charles Worthington wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Bob what program is required for me to conduct benchmark tests with Crafty? >>>>>>>>>>>Could you please e-mail it or post a link here to it? Thank you. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Charles, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>You have it, the "crafty" program has a built in benchmark ....start crafty in >>>>>>>>>>dos mode (console) with no crafty.rc file ( a plain taxt file you create with >>>>>>>>>>engine parameters - but in this case - do not have a crafty.rc file in the same >>>>>>>>>>directory as crafty). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Type word "bench" at the command prompt. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Mike >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Thanks Mike. I haven't set the Crafty you sent me up yet so I didn't know. In >>>>>>>>>all honesty I have no Idea how to set it up to run on the Chessbase server. The >>>>>>>>>Crafty that comes with fritz is already set up so I have never had to set one up >>>>>>>>>yet. The other foreign progs are easy just drop in the eng and dll and you are >>>>>>>>>done. This does not look so easy. :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>640 kNs.....Not good :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>on your new machine?? >>>>>> >>>>>>ok I see it in your title ...that is respectable for 1.2Ghz Celeron -- it's in >>>>>>the ballpark -- I think a dual 3 Ghz will get 3M nps.... >>>>> >>>>>Hyatts Dual xeon 2.8GHz only gets 2.1 million in the benchmark.. >>>>>If you scale it up to 3.06x2 + HT you'll only see about 2.3 million. >>>> >>>>I won't try to predict that performance, it needs testing. The 3.06 xeons >>>>have 533mhz FSB, while my 2.8s are 400. That is a difference above and beyond >>>>the raw clock speed. >>> >>>When I did testing vs Athlon SDR systems and DDR systems I noticed next to no >>>difference in Crafty's performance. Doubling bandwidth made less than a 2% >>>increase (if even that). Here is the graph I did back then, all "Thunderbird" >>>systems are SDR, all AthlonXP's are DDR. I also included 1GHz/100fsb Athlon >>>Tbird results vs 1GHz/133fsb results. Here is the list: >>> >>>http://speedycpu.dyndns.org/crafty/c1900-bench.jpg >>> >>>So you can compare: AthlonXP 1600+'s are 1.4GHz, compare with Tbird 1.4GHz. >>>AthlonXP 1500+'s are 1.33GHz, compare with the Tbird 1.33. >>> >>>>>Crafty v19.4 (1 cpus) >>>>> >>>>>White(1): mt=4 >>>>>max threads set to 4 >>>>>White(1): bench >>>>>Running benchmark. . . >>>>>...... >>>>>Total nodes: 104415743 >>>>>Raw nodes per second: 2130933 >>>>>Total elapsed time: 49 >>>>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 13.061224 >>>>>White(1): end >> >>A faster FSB does more than just add bandwidth. CL=2 ram on a 100 MHz FSB is >>slower latency-wise than CL=2 ram on a 133 MHz FSB. The ram timings in your >>results aren't posted, but I would bet that they are different in some cases. >>This can make a world of difference, particularly since the processors burn off >>a lot of precious cycles waiting on memory. >> >>-Matt > >I used the fastest options available in the bios, CL2, 4-bank interleave, >various things like that. And what about everyone else? -Matt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.