Author: Tony Hedlund
Date: 02:52:09 02/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2003 at 15:47:11, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >Tony, > >I want to say to you the same as to Jonas. To me it makes no sense to talk to >you because you don't like open debates. Your interest is to defed SSDF also in >its faults. But that then develops into a mean debate with tricks an personal >attacks. Not by me. >It simply makes no sense. I am interested in the best theoretical views >while you want to justify SSDF by all means. This becomes boring. Because you >defend false methods. But I don't care. Do what you want. I debate with people >of similar scientifical interest. Then why don't you answer Maurizio De Leo's questions, and debate with him? Or is it so that "people of similar scientifical interest" is people with the same idea as you, as Richard Pijl seem to have. Whom you willingly debate with. Tony >If you should have questions or something new >then I will return. But this here is simply too time consuming. > >Don't take this as a personal attack. > >Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.