Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 03:42:46 02/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2003 at 05:52:09, Tony Hedlund wrote: >On February 21, 2003 at 15:47:11, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>Tony, >> >>I want to say to you the same as to Jonas. To me it makes no sense to talk to >>you because you don't like open debates. Your interest is to defed SSDF also in >>its faults. But that then develops into a mean debate with tricks an personal >>attacks. > >Not by me. > >>It simply makes no sense. I am interested in the best theoretical views >>while you want to justify SSDF by all means. This becomes boring. Because you >>defend false methods. But I don't care. Do what you want. I debate with people >>of similar scientifical interest. > >Then why don't you answer Maurizio De Leo's questions, and debate with him? >Or is it so that "people of similar scientifical interest" is people with the >same idea as you, as Richard Pijl seem to have. Whom you willingly debate with. That is a good example for what I called personal attacks. You don't know what you are talking here. Scientifical interests is identical with objective questioning and analysing. Period. Rolf Tueschen > >Tony > >>If you should have questions or something new >>then I will return. But this here is simply too time consuming. >> >>Don't take this as a personal attack. >> >>Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.