Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Dangers in CC - SSDF: Terminology, Statistics

Author: Janosch Zwerensky

Date: 13:07:28 02/22/03

Go up one level in this thread

>Since I have published my critic against the presentation of a "number one"
>people tried to defend the actual practice in SSDF.
>
>Here is one clear example for a terrible confusion:

Do you or don't you apply the same sort of criticism to the FIDE rating list
too?

• Re: Dangers in CC - SSDF: Terminology, Statistics Rolf Tueschen 13:46:59 02/22/03
  • Re: Dangers in CC - SSDF: Terminology, Statistics John C. 22:10:39 02/23/03
  • Re: Dangers in CC - SSDF: Terminology, Statistics Janosch Zwerensky 01:50:42 02/23/03
    • Re: Dangers in CC - SSDF: Terminology, Statistics Rolf Tueschen 02:57:59 02/23/03
      • Re: Dangers in CC - SSDF: Terminology, Statistics Tony Hedlund 08:29:20 02/23/03
        • Re: Dangers in CC - SSDF: Terminology, Statistics Rolf Tueschen 10:37:49 02/23/03
          • Re: Dangers in CC - SSDF: Terminology, Statistics Tony Hedlund 10:36:50 02/24/03
            • Re: Dangers in CC - SSDF: Terminology, Statistics Rolf Tueschen 12:42:32 02/24/03
              • Re: Dangers in CC - SSDF: Terminology, Statistics Tony Hedlund 08:33:25 02/25/03
                • Re: Dangers in CC - SSDF: Terminology, Statistics Rolf Tueschen 10:59:50 02/25/03

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.