Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:48:16 02/23/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2003 at 19:43:03, Charles Worthington wrote: >On February 22, 2003 at 18:12:18, david wight wrote: > >>i have a tiny gripe if anyone could help clear up, here it is,on the S.S.D.F >>rating list 54th place hiarcs 7.32 64 MB p200 mmx is rated 2470 and 55th place >>fritz 5.0 PB29% 67 MB P200 mmx is rated 2461 and the little hand held novag >>sapphire is rated 2009.why is chessmaster 2 not on this list with a rating of >>2468?and why do the testers waste thier time with rating computers below >>2000?please help?, > >Because Chessmaster 2 does not really play at 2468 on the sony playstation . >That is just it's claim. On the fritz server it would do good to hold 2100. The question is what is the eqvivalent ssdf rating. I do not know to compare between the rating on the Fritz server and the ssdf rating. I do not say that chesssmaster2 could get 2468 ssdf rating but I have no idea what is the right formula to translate ssdf rating to fritz server rating. If the difference between dual and single cpu in the Fritz server is more than 100 elo then I guess that the differences in ssdf is smaller than the differences in the fritz server. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.