Author: Chessfun
Date: 11:46:16 02/23/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 2003 at 12:24:26, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On February 23, 2003 at 12:05:49, Chessfun wrote: > >>On February 23, 2003 at 11:31:36, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On February 23, 2003 at 11:03:42, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>>On February 23, 2003 at 10:34:55, bobby palacios wrote: >>>> >>>>>p4 2.47ghz, 128mb hash, remis.ctg (24 game match) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Fritz 8 vs Shredder 7 2003 >>>>> >>>>> 123456789012345678901 >>>>>1 Shredder 7 1½½1½½01001000111½½10 11.0/21 >>>>>2 Fritz 8 0½½0½½10110111000½½01 10.0/21 >>>>> >>>> >>>>I'm sure if you were using the books these programs were supplied with you'd >>>>generate much more interest in this match. >>>> >>>>Sarah. >>> >>> Hi Sarah >>> I am rather happy that Bobby is not testing the opening books but more >>> the real strenght of the programs. And what is it that you are guessing >>> that the match would be more interesting with the original books? Because >>> of book learning? >>> Kurt >> >>Using remis.ctg as opposed to the original books don't tell me which is >>stronger. Neither would this match were original books used. It isn't more >>interesting. It's how they were designed to be played. >> >>Also I see many, many posts here using remis.ctg and 2600.ctg. IMO probably 50% >>of the time because those people don't actually own the programs. That's more >>the reason why people use these books, they are accepted as good and the excuse >>that the programs are then equal or we can see the true strength are simply that >>excuses for why the original books are not used. >> >>Sarah. > > Never had I thought about this: the use of remis.ctg or 2600.ctg [what is > this?] It's a ctg made from 2600+ ELO GM games. >may indeed be because some people don't own the programs. This is > however no longer possible since Shredder7. Why not?. I think you'll find you're wrong about that. >BTW, we shall soon start a > 120'/40 tournament [50-100 rounds] with the best six engines, and the > strongest CM9_X, and this time we shall most probably use the original > books. > Kurt Yes this would be interesting. Say. Deep Fritz 7, Fritz 8, Fritz 7, Shredder 7 and what else?. Tiger 15? I know it can't run in CB but you could autoplay it?. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.