Author: Chessfun
Date: 11:54:05 02/23/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 2003 at 14:46:16, Chessfun wrote: >On February 23, 2003 at 12:24:26, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>On February 23, 2003 at 12:05:49, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On February 23, 2003 at 11:31:36, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>> >>>>On February 23, 2003 at 11:03:42, Chessfun wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 23, 2003 at 10:34:55, bobby palacios wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>p4 2.47ghz, 128mb hash, remis.ctg (24 game match) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Fritz 8 vs Shredder 7 2003 >>>>>> >>>>>> 123456789012345678901 >>>>>>1 Shredder 7 1½½1½½01001000111½½10 11.0/21 >>>>>>2 Fritz 8 0½½0½½10110111000½½01 10.0/21 >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>I'm sure if you were using the books these programs were supplied with you'd >>>>>generate much more interest in this match. >>>>> >>>>>Sarah. >>>> >>>> Hi Sarah >>>> I am rather happy that Bobby is not testing the opening books but more >>>> the real strenght of the programs. And what is it that you are guessing >>>> that the match would be more interesting with the original books? Because >>>> of book learning? >>>> Kurt >>> >>>Using remis.ctg as opposed to the original books don't tell me which is >>>stronger. Neither would this match were original books used. It isn't more >>>interesting. It's how they were designed to be played. >>> >>>Also I see many, many posts here using remis.ctg and 2600.ctg. IMO probably 50% >>>of the time because those people don't actually own the programs. That's more >>>the reason why people use these books, they are accepted as good and the excuse >>>that the programs are then equal or we can see the true strength are simply that >>>excuses for why the original books are not used. >>> >>>Sarah. >> >> Never had I thought about this: the use of remis.ctg or 2600.ctg [what is >> this?] > > >It's a ctg made from 2600+ ELO GM games. You also posted a message http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?286353 in a post that included the use of 2600.ctg? Sarah. > > >>may indeed be because some people don't own the programs. This is >> however no longer possible since Shredder7. > > >Why not?. I think you'll find you're wrong about that. > > >>BTW, we shall soon start a >> 120'/40 tournament [50-100 rounds] with the best six engines, and the >> strongest CM9_X, and this time we shall most probably use the original >> books. >> Kurt > >Yes this would be interesting. Say. Deep Fritz 7, Fritz 8, Fritz 7, Shredder 7 >and what else?. Tiger 15? I know it can't run in CB but you could autoplay it?. > >Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.