Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 15:30:30 02/23/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 2003 at 17:22:40, Peter Kappler wrote: >On February 23, 2003 at 15:20:37, Janosch Zwerensky wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>let's consider this position that happened today in Linares: >> >>[D]2kr3r/4b1p1/pqn1p3/1p1pP3/2pP1Bn1/P1P3N1/1P1QB2P/R3K2R b KQ - 0 21 >> >>Do any programs want to play 21. ... Ngxe5!, like Radjabov did? >>Have any of you played out the possible continuations 22. dxe5 and 22. Bxe5 in >>engine-matches or is there GM analysis somewhere already available on these? >> >>Regards, >>Janosch > > >I don't think this sacrifice is sound. I haven't seen any GM analysis, but I >did look at the position briefly with Fritz. Perhaps I miss something but isn't such a phrasing nonsense? I wished that you could give a context of your opinion. But then to seek help with Fritz seems premature. What is your own opinion? Rolf Tueschen > Here's what I found: >After 21. Ngxe5 22. Bxe5 Nxe5 23. dxe5 Qc7 it's difficult for White to defend >the e-pawn, for example 24. Qe3 Bc5 25. Qg5 Be7 and now White either has to >repeat moves or hand Black a big initiative. An example line is 26. Qxg7 Rdg8 >27. Qf7 Rxg3 28. Qxe6+ Kb8 29. O-O-O (29. Qxa6?! Qxe5). Fritz thinks White is >fine, but maybe Kasparov wanted to keep things a bit more under control. > >If the above variation scared Kasparov, he could have played the simpler >24.O-O-O Qxe5 25. Kb1. White is doing well here - I don't know why Garry >wouldn't want this position. > >I didn't bother to look at 22. dxe5 d4, but I'm guessing Black is fine there. > >-Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.