Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:16:03 02/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 24, 2003 at 07:00:47, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On February 23, 2003 at 11:59:41, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>Kein Grund ins Sektierertum zu verfallen. > >Thorsten, what are you doing all day long? Are you not even aware of? Look into >your own comments on the progress of the final round in Paderborn. It was a >reveiling confession about your own emotions about the expected or feared >result. I wished that you could take all that with more objectivity. Then with >your experience you were a really good expert. Also didn't you notice your own >insinuating of some stuff not so koscher? > >Fact is that Stefan already in Maastricht let JUNIOR have it's spin, when the >planned show event against Kasparov already was near. Yesterday's lost is >something that no linger counted because Fritz already was through. I still ask >if there isn't a sort of button the operator could secretely push for such >decisions, "go for the kill", "now only seek a draw by all means even if there >might be a win" etc.? Because it's strange. There was a period when both, YACE >and SHREDDER repeated motifs and moves and then suddenly after the end in the >FRITZ game they went into a different mode. Suddenly Yace took c2 and the whole >game went into a different essence. > >I was always sure that Stefan had such features because SHREDDER was always >worse the moment other operators did their work. This is not by chance if it >happens 4 or 5 times in a row. These reflections have nothing to do with >conspiracy fairy tales! Better opening preperation may be the explanation. I guess that stefan has statistics about results based on opponent and opening for a lot of opponents and when shredder plays against an opponent it can often use opening choice when statistics tells him that he has better chances. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.