Author: Chessfun
Date: 08:57:25 02/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 24, 2003 at 11:46:21, Albert Silver wrote: >On February 24, 2003 at 10:47:18, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On February 24, 2003 at 09:58:30, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>Fun or not, since the programs from different pools (and or generations) do not >>>play each other a combined list is misleading. That is the same mistake of the >>>SSDF. >> >>It's only for fun, hence not reliable. > >I have to agree with Rolf. She should only publish her results until there is a >statistically reliable amount of games, Err can you please state what that number would be for us? My rating list currently shows Fritz 8 with 98 games and a + - less than some programs in the current SSDF list. The same argument can be and was made by Rolf re; The SSDF's posting of Shredder 7 as #1. otherwise people might be misled into >believing Fritz 8 is actually 1 Elo point stronger than Deep Fritz 7. The data is there for people to see, what they choose to make of it is their choice. And it maybe more than that 1 point, I'll get back to you once my + - gets to zero which will be, ohhh yea NEVER. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.