Author: Chessfun
Date: 09:10:51 02/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 24, 2003 at 11:58:57, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On February 24, 2003 at 11:46:21, Albert Silver wrote: > >>I have to agree with Rolf. She should only publish her results until there is a >>statistically reliable amount of games, otherwise people might be misled into >>believing Fritz 8 is actually 1 Elo point stronger than Deep Fritz 7. >> >> Albert > >The problem isn't only the number of games, where the accuracy is covered by the >SD information. But also the game collection presents some problems, which are >partly mentioned, so the list is purely "for fun". That is why I categorized it >as "not" being reliable in my previous comment and it doesn't presume to be. Not >that hard to understand, really. > >Regards, >Mogens I will in future rename the Fun List the Unreliable Fun List. This should go some way to satisfy. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.