Author: Matt Taylor
Date: 09:47:47 02/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 2003 at 11:06:51, Chessfun wrote: >On February 22, 2003 at 19:39:17, enrico carrisco wrote: > >>On February 22, 2003 at 18:40:29, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On February 22, 2003 at 17:46:35, Matt Taylor wrote: >>> >>>>On February 22, 2003 at 17:15:47, Ed Panek wrote: >>>> >>>>>Name: geniussix >>>>> >>>>>Ed >>>> >>>>2.2 GHz or AthlonMP 2200 (1.8 GHz)? >>>> >>>>-Matt >>> >>>The title is clear as water a Dual = MP 2200 >>> >>>Pichard >> >>Where in the title does it say MP 2200? What kind of water are you looking at? >> >>Here are the finger notes. They are dual MP 2600's slightly overclocked. >> >>-elc. >> >>--- >>Statistics for Geniussix(C) (Last disconnected Sat Feb 22, 18:40 EST 2003) >> >> 1: Currently DEEP FRITZ Dual Athlon 2.2GHZ > >> 9: Dual AMD 2600+ overclocked to 2750+ 1 GBDDR 345 Tb's > >Which is right? > >Sarah. Both. The AMD performance rating would be 2750, but the actual clock rate is 2.2 GHz. Here's the old equation: Performance rating = (clockrate - 1400) * 3/2 + 1600 It gets adjusted for Barton processors (AthlonXP 2500, 2700, 3000) because they have more cache. It also gets adjusted for the AthlonXP 2400 and AthlonXP 2800. The AthlonXP 2400 should be 1.93 GHz but is actually 2 GHz. The old AthlonXP 2700 (2.13 GHz) still uses the above equation. All AthlonMP chips available right now also use that equation. Doing the math, (2200 - 1400) * 3/2 + 1600 = 2800+ performance rating for 2.2 GHz. -Matt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.