Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Another 2 Killerlosses but this time ONLINE - yah

Author: Eduard Nemeth

Date: 05:39:18 02/25/03

Go up one level in this thread


On February 25, 2003 at 06:00:01, Jeroen van Dorp wrote:

>On February 24, 2003 at 23:20:08, Elitra Bob wrote:
>
>>
>>That was a real game by the way.  All those games were real and not played at
>>home!!!
>
>Why are the games at home not real? Why were they faked? What evidence do you
>have that they were faked?
>
>
>>.......he blunders all the time
>
>Where does he blunder "all the time"? In all games? In all games against what or
>who?
>
>
>>there you have it.
>
>Where? I see just two random games, like Eduard posts some random games here
>quite often pointing out computer weaknesses in blitz play.
>
>>We're dealing with Eduard.  Lying is the Eduards´ stock and
>>trade.  Lying, this is what Eduards specialise in........yah
>
>What is his lying exactly about?
>
>Do I make up from your message that the games Eduard publicizes here on this
>board are fake? What is your proof for that, exactly? Is losing a game an
>indication that you lied about winning another game against the same opponent?
>
>You're not very clear. If you can't come up with something more substantial,
>leave the slandering where it belongs: in the bin.
>
>
>J.

To Elitra:

Normally none plays one in the computer hall 3+0 against computers. Or?

That was an experiment.

Also one does not play 5+2 as one 5+0 separates if, then!

No computer takes a Remis on after 20 moves in lightning if equal to position
is.  There must have somewhat wrongly run thus, because after it I played
exactly wrongly.  Ok one?

In such a way but if you continue to provoke so to listen to (without a reason
of the player) you me again to never see there... then play I only with
opponents with which I over timing before denied yourself.

There are such fair players enough!

3+0 game only experimental can be, or?

Eduard

Normal spielt kein Man im Computersaal 3+0 gegen Computer. Das war ein
Experiment.
Auch spielt man als Man keine 5+0 sondern wenn, dann 5+2!

Kein Computer nimmt ein Remis an nach 20 Zügen im Blitz wenn die Stellung gleich
ist. Da muss also etwas falsch gelaufen sein, denn genau danach habe ich falsch
gespielt. Ok?

Aber wenn Du so weiter provozierst (ohne eine Begründung des Spielers anzuhören)
so wirst Du mich dort nie wieder sehen ... dann spiele ich nur noch mit Gegnern
mit den ich mich über Zeiteinteilung vorher abgesprochen habe. Solche faire
Spieler gibt es genug!

Eine 3+0 game kann nur experimental sein, oder? Also!




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.