Author: Pat King
Date: 08:42:24 02/25/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 24, 2003 at 18:00:25, Uri Blass wrote: > (long story with easy ending) > >I see that I did not include it in the right order and now I have no problem. > >Uri I would submit that being dependent on include order, though perhaps not a bug, is bad practice. All my includes are in alphabetical order. While this doesn't preclude such dependencies, enforcing an arbitrary order at least ensures they are repeatable :) Pat
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.