Author: Harald Faber
Date: 09:11:47 02/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
If you find any irony in this text, you are an attentive reader! On February 27, 2003 at 07:05:27, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >This itself is a very good example for trolls. Harold, also a former moderator, >and from Germany, [where most of those came from who followed undemocratic >traditions during the change from rgcc to ccc; I can well give the names if >someone wants it], is a symbol for those who Cool, I am a symbol! (BTW aren't you from Germany too?) > - present their "test results" from autoplayer games I admit this is a crime. > - have no time to discuss the sense of the naked data I have no time for nothing. > - are unable to understand the meaning of a general and basic critic Probably I understand nothing too. > - therefore take such critics as a personal attack against their hobby Oops, are you really wrong? No, I don't take it personal, I just find it annoying and nerving to read the same stories again and again. Based on nothing. And if you are as scientifical as you pretend to be, then you should know that first there has to be DATA on which discussions etc. should be based on. And I don't speak of available SSDF data. > - then instead of training in tolerance go into biting mode of extinction Training in tolerance... this really makes me laugh. My patience in fact is adored by some friends, but how should you know... > - misunderstand the meaning of challenge & refutations How do you know what I understand and what I don't? > - can only imagine such refutations on the same level they do tests Uh, another crime. > - can't get that sometimes tests are pretty meaningless LOL! > - misinterprete their own activity as the only imaginable one Yes, I misinterprete, cannot imagine anything, I am really a poor guy. > - misuse the charta which forbids personal attacks (troll, pissed [!]) No need to whine now. > - misuse their "expert" status for exerting power in a social group Indeed, I really remember pushing CCC-members to make them complain about you, insult you, demand your withdrawel etc. And 90% of all those who have read my propaganda did as I wished. I am really a powerful guy now. >I could give more such items. The most illogical argument is in fact that the >activities of the average "tester" could only be challenged with "alternative" >data [apparently imaginable only as the same sort of testings only with >_different_ results] and not with a totally different approach. So it's always >the same. Thoughts are more important than material, in special if material is >based on mistaken thoughts. > >Rolf Tueschen In all these years nothing has changed. You are still questioning everything but do not present other ways based on experimental data that could show that your approach is right. This is kind of German opposition. Always complaining but not able to do it better himself. Or "Besserwisser sind Schlechtermacher". Criticizing other people's work is easy. Doing better obviously does not count to your qualifications. You just hide all your misbehaviour behind your excellent English vocabulary.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.