Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:59:08 02/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 28, 2003 at 12:54:25, Amir Ban wrote: >On February 28, 2003 at 03:11:41, Uri Blass wrote: > >>3)If I understood correctly most of your work from Junior5 is about evaluation. >> >>It may be interesting to know if Junior8 can beat Junior5 with time odds of 3:1 >>(it is possible to say +200% for one engine in engine matches) >> >>I believe that it will be the case only if the time control is long enough >>but again I think that better search rules with the same evaluation may give >>exponential improvement when the time control is slower. >> > >Interesting experiment. I ran it on my dual A1500, 5 min vs. 15 min. Only 4 >games, but pretty convincing. Junior 5 was released in 1998. > >Amir I see based on the time that you used ponder on. I thought about games without pondering because pondering reduce part of the advantage. I do not know how much but if you want to compare the improvement relative to theoretic improvement of being 3 times faster then the only way except using ponder off is to write a loop that tells Junior8 to do nothing in 2/3 of the time and to play games without time odds. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.