Author: blass uri
Date: 08:35:15 10/04/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 1998 at 10:39:57, Moritz Berger wrote: >On September 26, 1998 at 05:44:01, Moritz Berger wrote: > >>Nunn-Match 40/120, 20/60 >> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >>1 HIARCS 6,P233MMX 2540 1½1111½1111½0½½11½11 16.0/20 >>2 CST Black,PII-400 2450 0½0000½0000½1½½00½00 4.0/20 >> >>ELO performance difference Hiarcs P233MMX - CST PII400: 240 > >If you have wondered about the validity of Nunn test results, there's 66 ICC >games from Lonnie Cook on r.g.c.c. The performance of CSTal Windows/Beta >correlates perfectly with the Hiarcs/Black 289 version I used on my PII/400. >Lonnie's hardware is (I got this from his finger notes: (DoctorWho)): > >Chess System Tal ~ known as "CSTal" This is the beta ver 1.0 -- win95 > 2: AMD K6-300 -- SOYO mbd/1 meg cache -- 112MHz bus -- 64 negs of PC100 RAM. what is the speed of this hardware relatively to pII/400? > >Performance on ICC was: > >Opponents avg. rating: 2393 >CSTWin/BETA +19 =9 -38 total: 36% >ELO-Performance 2284 you cannot campare the results because the games on ICC are not 40 moves for 2 hours If you want to compare the results you need to do the nunn test with CStal with time control similiar to ICC I cannot believe that Cstalwin95 has only 2300 in serious games after seeing the results of Thorsten's tournament(Cstal has 6.5 out of 9) maybe this rating is only for fast games Uri > >In the Nunn test, CSTAL/Black achieved an ELO performance of 2300. Quite >accurate, in my opinion. > > >Moritz
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.