Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 09:57:58 10/04/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 1998 at 11:35:15, blass uri wrote: > >On October 04, 1998 at 10:39:57, Moritz Berger wrote: > >>On September 26, 1998 at 05:44:01, Moritz Berger wrote: >> >>>Nunn-Match 40/120, 20/60 >>> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >>>1 HIARCS 6,P233MMX 2540 1½1111½1111½0½½11½11 16.0/20 >>>2 CST Black,PII-400 2450 0½0000½0000½1½½00½00 4.0/20 >>> >>>ELO performance difference Hiarcs P233MMX - CST PII400: 240 >> >>If you have wondered about the validity of Nunn test results, there's 66 ICC >>games from Lonnie Cook on r.g.c.c. The performance of CSTal Windows/Beta >>correlates perfectly with the Hiarcs/Black 289 version I used on my PII/400. >>Lonnie's hardware is (I got this from his finger notes: (DoctorWho)): >> >>Chess System Tal ~ known as "CSTal" This is the beta ver 1.0 -- win95 >> 2: AMD K6-300 -- SOYO mbd/1 meg cache -- 112MHz bus -- 64 negs of PC100 RAM. > >what is the speed of this hardware relatively to pII/400? >> >>Performance on ICC was: >> >>Opponents avg. rating: 2393 >>CSTWin/BETA +19 =9 -38 total: 36% >>ELO-Performance 2284 > >you cannot campare the results because the games on ICC are not 40 moves for 2 >hours > >If you want to compare the results you need to do the nunn test with CStal with >time control similiar to ICC > >I cannot believe that Cstalwin95 has only 2300 in serious games after seeing the >results of Thorsten's tournament(Cstal has 6.5 out of 9) > >maybe this rating is only for fast games > >Uri Most of the games vs "Crafty" were 30 30 or longer, which is something like 40 moves in 1 hour, roughly. Some were longer as 45 45 and so forth... > > >>In the Nunn test, CSTAL/Black achieved an ELO performance of 2300. Quite >>accurate, in my opinion. >> >> >>Moritz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.