Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:05:36 03/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 03, 2003 at 19:03:01, Sune Fischer wrote: >On March 03, 2003 at 18:46:32, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: > >>On March 03, 2003 at 18:29:29, Sune Fischer wrote: >> >>>It seems like a must-have extension, but with an incremental move generator how >>>does one implement it? >>> >>>Do you re-search at the end with +1 ply when you find there was only one move? >>> >>>Do you save it in hash so next time you know, or what..? >> >>When you are in check, generate all legal moves. >> >>Miguel > >Yes true, but the check + one-reply case is not so interesting, since I already >extend here because of the check. I guess this is the most frequent case though. > >-S. Note that I don't know of anyone extending when there is only one legal move. The original algorithm was "one legal reply to check" which means you are in check _and_ you have only one way out.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.