Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Crafty "X" vs Deep Sjeng 84 games @ 5'/game (correct subject)

Author: Mike Byrne

Date: 04:53:07 03/04/03

Go up one level in this thread


On March 04, 2003 at 07:31:18, Uri Blass wrote:

>On March 04, 2003 at 07:10:21, Mike Byrne wrote:
>
>>On March 04, 2003 at 02:36:53, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On March 03, 2003 at 19:01:47, Mike Byrne wrote:
>>>
>>>>On March 03, 2003 at 19:00:53, Mike Byrne wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Dual 1.8 Ghz
>>>>>Hiarcs Book
>>>>>Ponder ON
>>>>>CB GUI
>>>>>
>>>>>Very nice result against this modified Crafty "x" personlity.
>>>
>>>Do you have results of that modified Crafty x personality against other programs
>>>in the same condition?
>>>
>>>If losing 47-37 against Crafty X is a very nice result for a commercial program
>>>then it means that this Crafty X is very strong and probably can beat also
>>>Ruffian,Sos3.Yace,List in the same conditions(maybe even with higher score).
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>I don't follow your logic -
>>
>>1.  We're talking blitz -- not long games.  To me blitz does not really
>>establish strength of engine at long games.  To me a true measure of engine
>>stength is how well it does at long games.
>>
>>2.  We're talking commercial engine yes - but just two months ago it was
>>considered amatuer.  Quantum leaps in strength do happen very often.  Just
>>because Deep Sjeng is now commercial does not automatically place it at the top
>>of the amatuer engine list in strength.
>
>Yes, but I read a claim that it is 200 elo better than Sjeng12.13 and sjeng12.13
>is not supposed to be better than 200 elo worse than crafty.
>
>I also read matches when Deep Sjeng beated crafty convincingly and people asked
>about results against Ruffian.
>
>After seeing it losing 47-37 then the result is a clear disappointment.
>
>I do not say that losing 47-37 against crafty is always a disappointment for a
>commercial engine and the disappointment is mainly because of the claim that
>Deep Sjeng is significantly better than Sjeng12.13 when Sjeng12.13 is supposed
>to be only slightly weaker than crafty based on results that GCP posted in the
>winboard forum(the results were not in long time control games).
>
>I also remember that GCP claimed that Deep Sjeng is already better than Crafty
>in this forum.
>
>Uri

This is blitz game/5.  It does not say anything about LTC.  It's too early to
tell yet.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.