Author: Harald Faber
Date: 23:23:52 10/04/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 03, 1998 at 20:25:32, Mark Young wrote: >>If it is generally agreed by most testers that the Walther Piltz settings are >>stronger than the default CM5000/6000 settings, why not use this setting to test >>CM6000 against other programmes such as Nimzo98 etc rather than the default >>CM6000 setting as this will give us an indication of the real power of what is >>possibly the srtongest PC programme developed so far! >> >>I hope that chessbase can convince Dekonnig to produce a version of the King for >>32 bit Fritz/ Crafty so that their can be a real 5 way slugfest between the >>worlds strongest programmes >>Rajen Gupta Probably Mindscape offers him better conditions which means more money because of more sells... >I agree the walter-pilz settings are better in CM5000 & CM5500. I don't know if >they are best in CM6000 over the default values. We need more games. No, the WP-settings are not so good in CM6k. But I have others, still testing. You may try: style: attacker/defender -15; selectivity 10 positional: material/position 20; control of center 100; mobility 115; king safety 160; passed pawns 103; pawn weakness 125 material: queen 10, rook 5.5, bishop 3.5, knight 3.2 (!) and pawn 1.0 This settings produced a fabulous game against Junior4.6 whilst the original ones lost in the same line. Please try out these settings and report of your experience, preferably in rgcc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.