Author: Jari Huikari
Date: 09:05:39 10/05/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 1998 at 05:27:00, Alessio Iacovoni wrote: >Why don't chess programs automatically implement a random chess feature changing >(by some say .05) the evaluation algorithms? I COULD do this thing to Nero 4. But perhaps in a different way than you suggest: Nero uses now iterative deepening and calculates values to all the legal moves. After it has used the given time, it goes to a loop in which it chooses the one with best score. And I could add some small random number to the scores in this loop, AFTER evaluating moves, so without random confusing anything in search. User could e.g. give some "rate of randomness" value to be used: (0= just pick the best one, 1= some randomness, 10 = totally random moves....) Or something... Nice Idea! Jari
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.