Author: Matthew White
Date: 17:09:55 03/05/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 04, 2003 at 21:44:35, Joseph Merolle wrote: I agree (to an extent) of your characterization of the positional engines, though I would probably include TheKing in the positional list before I put it in the tactical one. I think that Nimzo8 is probably one of the strongest tactical engines I have used. From what I understand, Fritz 5.32 is highly tactical as well. I have seen excellent tactics from Little Goliath. Matt >No , not at all Best tactics go to the chessbase Tigers ( gambit) then comes >chessmaster , best positional eninges go to Shredder then Hiarcs Rebel is a >vary positional however can not keep up with the chessbase engines. > > > >Regards JAMerolle > > > > >On March 04, 2003 at 20:42:05, KIRK SEARS wrote: > >>Which engine or engines out right now are considered the best tactical and best >>positional, not necesarily strongest. >> >>I am guessing at what I have read on this message board that Nimzo/Hiarcs are >>strong tactical engines and Shredder and Rebel are the strongest positionally. >> >>Most I assume are somewhere in the middle, but which ones best fit into either >>category? >> >>thanx
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.