Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:57:00 03/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2003 at 11:18:59, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On March 06, 2003 at 11:15:44, Daniel Clausen wrote: > >>On March 06, 2003 at 11:13:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>[snip] >> >>>Sorry but my code is 100% ansi C compliant. Feel free to point out somewhere >>>where it isn't of course. >> >>AFAIK, ANSI-C doesn't support a 64bit integer type. Not that I intend to help >>Vincent, but.. you asked! :) >> >>Sargon (leaving the box-ring for the two opponents again :) > >long long in C99 standard > >==> knocking despite that Hyatt knockout because of denying a clear bug in his >code. I'm not denying a "clear bug". I've already responded to that in a previous post. I do deny a "ANSI-C standard violation". Unless you believe that every different unix C compiler on the planet is non-ANSI, because they all compile Crafty just fine, except for the occasional #ifdef bug that gets introduced when two changes by two different people interact in unexpected ways.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.