Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 00:59:18 03/07/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 07, 2003 at 01:28:43, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On March 06, 2003 at 22:58:42, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>First moves are: 1.e4 Nf6 2.Bc4 c6 3.a3 >> >>[D]rnbqkb1r/pp1ppppp/2p2n2/8/2B1P3/P7/1PPP1PPP/RNBQK1NR b KQkq - 0 1 >> >>Fritz 8.0023 played now nit Nxe4. :( >> >>Fritz 8.005 does it! :) >> >>My full german message read here: >> >>http://f50.parsimony.net/forum202029/messages/28.htm >> >>Eduard > > >So what?? He searched 24 hours to find a bug and then he came up with this?? > >Fritz 8.0.0.23 would play 3...d5 with big advantage already. After 3 moves with >the black pieces. >That is exactly what I want to see. >Its just silly to allow any complications if there is a safe way to get the full >point. > >Btw, Fritz 8 would never play 2...c6 and this move is also not in the Fritz8.ctg >tree. > >No chessplayer (except Eduard) would like to analyse such crap (3.a3??). > >IMO the programers tried to find something against the apparent weaknesses of >Fritz, which does not hurt against other programs >It has still some drawbacks but hardly in practical play. >Frans Morsch might find better ways in the future. > >Its not difficult to find other examples (die die Welt nicht braucht). > >[D] r1bqkb1r/pppppppp/2n2n2/8/2B1P3/8/PPPP1PPP/RNBQ1KNR b kq - 0 2 > >1.e4 Nc6 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.Kf1?? > >Analysis by Fritz 8: > >1. µ (-0.81): 3...e6 4.d3 d5 5.exd5 exd5 6.Lb5 Le7 7.Lxc6+ bxc6 8.Sf3 0-0 9.Se5 >2. ³ (-0.63): 3...a6 4.d3 e6 5.Lg5 Le7 6.Sc3 0-0 7.Sf3 d5 8.Lb3 dxe4 >3. ³ (-0.59): 3...Sa5 4.Ld3 e5 5.Sf3 Sc6 6.Lb5 Lc5 7.Sc3 0-0 8.d3 >4. ³ (-0.53): 3...d5 4.exd5 Sxd5 5.d4 Dd6 6.Se2 Sb6 7.Ld3 Lg4 8.f3 Df6 >5. ³ (-0.53): 3...e5 4.d3 Lc5 5.c3 d6 6.Sf3 0-0 7.d4 Lb6 8.Lg5 >6. ³ (-0.50): 3...d6 4.d3 Sa5 5.Sd2 Sxc4 6.Sxc4 e5 7.Sf3 Le6 8.b3 >7. ³ (-0.41): 3...g6 4.d3 Lg7 5.Sf3 0-0 6.Kg1 d5 7.exd5 Sxd5 8.De2 Lg4 >8. ³ (-0.34): 3...h6 4.d3 d5 5.exd5 Sxd5 6.Sf3 a6 7.Sbd2 Sb6 8.Kg1 Sxc4 >9. ³ (-0.34): 3...Tb8 4.d3 d5 5.exd5 Sxd5 6.Sf3 Lg4 7.Sbd2 Sa5 8.h3 Lh5 >10. ³ (-0.34): 3...a5 4.Sc3 Sxe4 5.Sxe4 d5 6.Ld3 dxe4 7.Lxe4 e5 >11. ³ (-0.31): 3...Sd4 4.Se2 Sxe2 5.Dxe2 d5 6.exd5 Sxd5 7.Sc3 Sb6 8.Ld3 c6 9.Le4 >12. = (-0.22): 3...h5 4.Sc3 e6 5.Sf3 d5 6.exd5 exd5 7.Lb5 Le7 8.Kg1 0-0 >13. = (-0.19): 3...Se5 4.Lb3 Sg6 5.Sc3 e6 6.d4 d5 7.exd5 exd5 8.Lg5 c6 >14. = (-0.19): 3...b6 4.Sc3 Lb7 5.Sf3 Sxe4 6.Sxe4 d5 7.Ld3 dxe4 8.Lxe4 Dd6 9.d4 >15. = (-0.19): 3...Sb4 4.e5 d5 5.Lb3 Sd7 6.d4 Sb6 7.c3 Sa6 8.Sd2 >16. = (-0.16): 3...b5 4.Lxb5 Sxe4 5.Lxc6 dxc6 6.d3 Dd6 7.Df3 Sf6 8.Lf4 >17. = (-0.16): 3...Tg8 4.d3 Se5 5.Lb3 d5 6.exd5 Sxd5 7.Dh5 g5 8.Lxd5 >18. = (-0.09): 3...g5 4.d3 Lg7 5.Sc3 g4 6.Sge2 Sa5 7.Kg1 Sxc4 >19. = (-0.03): 3...Sb8 4.e5 d5 5.Le2 Sfd7 6.Sf3 e6 7.Kg1 c5 8.d4 Sc6 >20. = (0.06): 3...Sg8 4.d4 d6 5.Sf3 Sf6 6.Lb5 a6 7.Lxc6+ bxc6 8.Sbd2 >21. ² (0.41): 3...Sg4 4.Lxf7+ Kxf7 5.Dxg4 e5 6.Sf3 Kg8 7.Dg3 Df6 >22. ± (1.25): 3...Sxe4 4.d3 Sf6 5.Sc3 d5 6.Lb5 Lg4 7.Sf3 a6 8.Lxc6+ bxc6 > >depth 14 > >Michael :( a) BUG is a BUG b) It is BUG like 8.0019 c) Fritz 8.005 hase it NOT! (see my other post). E.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.