Author: Peter Kasinski
Date: 07:06:44 03/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 08, 2003 at 09:25:08, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 08, 2003 at 09:00:13, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On March 08, 2003 at 08:37:29, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>If it is provided only for people who buy pocket grandmaster then I do not >>>consider it as free and it is possible that the author earns something from it. >> >>I'll rely on the readme rather than private speculation. From your point of view >>List 5.04 and Anaconda 1.00 are commercial as well by their association with >>exclusive Chessbase functionality, whether they receive anything for their >>troubles or not. That is pure nonsense. >> >>Regards, >>Mogens > >I agree that from my point of view List5.04 and Anconda1.00 are commercial. >I see no reason to consider a program as a free program if people need to buy >another program to get it. > >Maybe I should change my definitions and the word commercial is not the right >word but the word free is also not right because by my understanding a free >chess program means that nobody needs to buy another chess program to use it. > >Uri Not a single program is free since you have to get a computer to use it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.