Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Substantial CC messages vs Trash & Insults

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 15:25:53 03/08/03

Go up one level in this thread


On March 08, 2003 at 16:42:11, Volker Richey wrote:

>schwätz keinen mist.
>
>eduard wurde aus dem css-forum wegen seiner ewigen droherei und
>provoziererei rausgeschmissen. bist ja selber dort unerwünscht,
>was auch verständlich ist, da du ähnliche charakterzüge hast.
>kannst ja mit betroffenen leidensgenossen, einen "club der toten
>schachspieler" gründen.
>
>da eduard meint, durch attacken gegen das programm fritz,
>indirekt diejenigen zu treffen, die ihm aus dem forum geworfen haben,
>sind seine reaktionen nur zu verständlich. einem egozentriker die
>plattform seines handelns zu entziehen, ist das schlimmste was
>dem passieren kann.
>
>es war schon eine manie, dass nur nach negativem aus den neuen
>fritz-versionen gesucht wird.
>
>wie schon jemand sagte, der flugzeugtraeger chessbase ist nicht von
>dem schlauchboot eduard aus der bahn zu werfen.
>
>nun analysier mal schön.
>
>ps
>fuer einen psychater gibt es nur patienten und kollegen!

Since you gave me such a good confession, let me explain my standpoint. I did
never say that Eduard was a good politician. Eduard is a good chessplayer and
computerchess expert, with importance on chess. So what you are doing basically
is dishonest in highest degree, NOT because you had absolutely NO point for your
position, but because simply you pervert the whole topic in computerchess into a
question of psychiatry. That is exactly something you accused me of doing. But
to the contrary I always opposed such lay psychiatry diagnozing, see also my
Mosaic about the topic. It was about the attacks against Eduard. -

Why not simply taking Eduard for what he does good? Even if objectively the
actual error in Fritz is overinterpreted, why can't you let Eduard in peace when
he wants to present his results? At least he is presenting computerchess data,
no?????

People like you are dishonest. They want to defamate a collegue. Eduard is
accused of presenting too much data and then he is defamated and insulted as a
mentally ill. While I am defamated because I would allegedly bring no data at
all! But you see, you must decide yourself. And if I had to give you advice then
let Eduard in peace make his research and concentrate you critic against me.
Because I can handle it all better politically. Know what I mean?

Also, we have so few chess experts in the field. Why do you hate Eduard so much?
Try to prove him wrong in his chess, but try to moderate your anger against his
character defects - as you see them. Thanks for your attention.

Agsain, insult me personally if it must be done by all means, but leave Eduard
alone. If I could meet you in person I would tell you something else but this is
impossible via internet. I understand that your aggressive vocbulary does not
speak for your being a coward? I hope not, but often it is the case when people
overreact with such wordings. That is really psychiatry. What you gave here was
lay studies at best... Perhaps we can meet at a tournament and then we clarify
all this. I'm sure that you are a nice person in reality.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.