Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 19:22:10 03/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 08, 2003 at 21:15:36, Mike S. wrote:
>On March 08, 2003 at 15:55:11, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>
>>(...)
>>Note that you supported the character assassination of Eduard! That is evil!
>
>Where?? IMO I did the opposite, trying to point the discussion to the simple and
>important fact that he has discovered an engine bug (and away from emotional
>overreactions as I see them).
>
>As can be read above, Eduard himself is satisfied when somebody gets his main
>message so to speak, finally. He doesn't seem "assassinated" as you are claiming
>constantly...
Not constantly - only after you had written "Na gut"! Please, lt's keep the
facts straight.
>
>>(...) I thought
>>you wanted to be a spin doctor with style.
>
>with style: yes
>spin doctor: no
>
>I'm not the type of person who always critizises person or company (A), and
>always supports person or company (B). I critizise bad things and support good
>things, from (A) to (Z), including ChessBase. Also, I'm not the defender of
>ChessBase. They really don't require me for defense. When I write something
>which supports them, then it's because I'm convinced of it. I also have made
>critical remarks. I'm just talking chess, computer chess, software issues,... I
>don't have a secret mission. Let's have fun with computer chess, exchange
>information etc. is my endeavour.
I fully agree here.
>
>>(...) You are right, sometimes I wonder why I am not the spin doctor for
>>ChessBase because you do such a bad job. You don't even notice what is the main
>>fallacy in the defense of ChessBase. :)
>
>Indeed not, but *please* don't explain.
>
>>By trying to replace the two ignorants by yourself you
>>want to prove that _you_ do respect Eduard! But that was never the topic,
>>dearest Mickey. We talk about your support of THEIR insults againstsupport tho
>>Eduard.
>
>I didn't try to replace anybody from anything. I expressed my view. The topic
>was the F8.23 version IMO. You created a topic "character assasination", but I
>don't join that topic.
You are not obliged, but your "Na gut" was a support. What you are really
thinking is not my topic. I can only interprete what I read.
>
>Btw. if it's about character assasination at all, I guess most other readers
>will have noticed by now, that you are constantly attacking *my* reputation as
>being a honest participant in CC discussions.
>
>I shouldn't tolerate that any longer.
Unfortunately you can read what Eduard answered on Richey now and that is the
same Richey you supported with your "Na gut" ("Ok well done"). And Eduard just
said that Richey defamated and insulted him everywhere [and since I knew that
already I tried to tell you]! And you give now the innocent! That is a big
contrast, Mike, to your own statement about being open for all sides and facts.
You have stated that Eduard overreacted and that alone is a bias. Can you spell
exaltation? What is wrong with that? Go into your CSS and do what ou want but if
you come here [where Eduard is handicapped with his bad English] and support
Richey with his defamations against Eduard you get my answer. If I happen to
read it. Sorry but you can't get away with such wrong doing. I think we two did
never get into wars about computerchess topics. We should keep it this way. I
have great respect for your articles about CC. But please try to re-define your
opinion about Eduard. He's a real chess master. People should not exploit his
political weaknesses. This is indecent and dishonest. Period.
(I did not say that you are the main power against Eduard. But because you write
on such a high level I am disapointed when you support the insulting attitude by
Richey. Even with a two word expression! Fair enough?)
>
>>>Baseline 2 (to make it short): I don't think that I insulted anybody; I think
>>>Eduard has over-reacted but was right about the fact itself that there is
>>>obviously an engine bug in 8.23, and yes he is a strong chessplayer and I
>>>respect his achievements.
>
>>>>>(Engl.: Bottomline = Obviously there's an Nf6xe4-Enginebug; that type of
>>>>>position is *very common* in many openings. I expect a new engine version soon.)
>
>>>>>mfg.
>>>>>Michael Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.