Author: margolies,marc
Date: 19:44:55 03/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
if you can prescribe me a pill that would help me listen to you, then I am intersted. "judging the writers" is not meant perjoratively it means judging the merits of what they are saying about fritz. apparently you are judging me... run out of pills? On March 08, 2003 at 15:41:05, Lar Mader wrote: >On March 08, 2003 at 14:09:38, margolies,marc wrote: > >>there's no contraversy. no one claims the earlier build is better. people here >>test chess engines, evaluate their strengths and weaknesses and share their >>discovery with others. >>that we know problems and show them means programmers can improve. there is no >>argument that newer is worse perhaps you need to lurk here a little longer >>before you judge the writers. > >margolies, you need to take a pill and calm down. Robert Sanchez wasn't trying >to question the credibility of the people complaining about Fritz 8.0.0.23. He >was simply trying to understand the issue. And early on in these threads there >were some posts taking issue with Eduard Nemeths findings, so it's not >unreasonable for this poster to take a neutral stance. It is, however, >inappropriate for you to scold him for "judging the writers", since he wasn't.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.