Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 05:07:35 03/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
... >>> >>>Comet is not one of the fast searchers so I thought that for you it should be >>>not expensive. >> >>I don't see your point. Why should a certain percentage of extra-nodes be >>"cheaper" for a slower searcher than for a faster searcher ? > >The reason is simple. > >I assume that fast searcher may get significantly less nodes per seconds when it >does checks in the qsearch when it is not the case for slow searcher. I am not sure; perhaps the opposite is true: particularly, an engine with fast move generation will not pay too much for generating some extra nodes. Uli ...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.