Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 09:53:10 03/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 10, 2003 at 12:17:36, Peter Berger wrote: >On March 10, 2003 at 11:54:16, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>Computers might get at least a draw against Palciauskas in correspondence chess, > >I seriously doubt that. The idea to let a computer program make your moves and >relaying them isn't _very_ original so we can assume that there are some >correspondence players who really do it. > >They reach some level of rating - your guess what level that is is as good as >mine. > >But if you look at the ICCF rating list you'll see that the top players score >_way_ above that level ( my guess is at least 200-300 points). This list >definitely includes players who don't use chessprograms at all or to a very >limitted amount. > >Look at http://tables.iccf.com/jubilee/champions/50wcjt.html for example. Do you >think it is very likely that Umansky uses a chessprogram to smash his fellow >world champions ;) ? Looking at the tournament games I don't believe so. > Look at Hans Berliner he is the author of High Tech, there is no doubts in my mind that he is using at least his own program to help him analyze positions. Pichard > > >>but if you allow any of todays top 3 players ( Kramnik Kasparov, and Anand) to >>calculate 30 minutes per move the computers would NOT have a chance. I believe >>that at standard time control Deep Fritz, Deep Junior and Shredder have finally >>reached a point where the top players are having trouble to beat them, and this >>is due to the humans getting into time trouble most of the times. >> >>Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.