Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 10:07:38 03/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 10, 2003 at 12:53:10, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On March 10, 2003 at 12:17:36, Peter Berger wrote: > >>On March 10, 2003 at 11:54:16, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>Computers might get at least a draw against Palciauskas in correspondence chess, >> >>I seriously doubt that. The idea to let a computer program make your moves and >>relaying them isn't _very_ original so we can assume that there are some >>correspondence players who really do it. >> >>They reach some level of rating - your guess what level that is is as good as >>mine. >> >>But if you look at the ICCF rating list you'll see that the top players score >>_way_ above that level ( my guess is at least 200-300 points). This list >>definitely includes players who don't use chessprograms at all or to a very >>limitted amount. >> >>Look at http://tables.iccf.com/jubilee/champions/50wcjt.html for example. Do you >>think it is very likely that Umansky uses a chessprogram to smash his fellow >>world champions ;) ? Looking at the tournament games I don't believe so. >> > >Look at Hans Berliner he is the author of HiTech, there is no doubts in my >mind that he is using at least his own machine to help him analyze positions. http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/events/dls/1995-1996/Berliner.php >Pichard > >> >> >>>but if you allow any of todays top 3 players ( Kramnik Kasparov, and Anand) to >>>calculate 30 minutes per move the computers would NOT have a chance. I believe >>>that at standard time control Deep Fritz, Deep Junior and Shredder have finally >>>reached a point where the top players are having trouble to beat them, and this >>>is due to the humans getting into time trouble most of the times. >>> >>>Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.