Author: Matthew Barnett
Date: 10:55:52 03/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 10, 2003 at 05:34:07, emerson tan wrote: >what program is best to play correspondece chess against humans? When analysising middlegame positions with either the Deep Position Analysis feature in the Fritz GUI or just Infinite Analysis I came to the conclusion (a long time ago) that often the longer you leave the engine (any engine) to analyse a position the more inaccurate it gets. It's easy to demonstrate that the evaluation of a position, say 18-30 plies deep might be +0.10 but when the position at the end of its analysis is in turn pasted and analysed that evaluation may well drop to -1.10. I'm fairly sure that, in most middlegame scenarios, engines get weaker the longer you leave them. It's a different matter in the endgame! In short there is nothing like playing through the analysis yourself and using your own chess knowledge with the computer to test moves. Just my two pennies worth... Bests Matthew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.