Author: Mark Young
Date: 23:20:07 10/05/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 1998 at 01:44:15, Mark Young wrote: >On October 05, 1998 at 20:42:12, Paul Petersson wrote: > >>Here are some results from testing two Celeron processors. I used the BT16 >>position and Rebel 8. >> >> >>REBEL 8 BT16 >>-------------------------------------------- >> >>Celeron 266 @266 MHz (66*4) 5:29 >> >>Celeron 266 @400 MHz (100*4) 3:39 >> >> >>Celeron 300A @300 MHz (66*4.5) 2:56 >> >>Celeron 300A @450 MHz (100*4.5) 1:58 >> >>Celeron 300A @460 MHz (102*4.5) 1:55 >> >>Celeron 300A @504 MHz (112*4.5) 1:45 >> >>It gets very hot at 504 MHz, and hangs after a while, but at 460 MHz and lower >>it runs without problems. >> >> >>Paul > >Some of the times you post seem a bit fast for the Intel chip. Did you use 4 mb >of hash, and use the time to complete the full 9 ply search. Your 450mhz time of >1:58 is very close to Ed's time of 1:44 for his 450mhz AMD K6-2 chip. If I use >28mb of hash on my computer. I do a 9 ply search over 1 min faster then I do >using 4mb. One of the reasons 28mb is faster is you do not find the key move >Nxg2 so the program does not hang on that move for a long time, checking out the >move to make sure it is good. Now at 60mb Hash I find the key move Nxg2 and it >take me about 1 min longer to do 9 plys over 28mb hash and about the same as 4mb >hash. Here is what I mean. 4mb hash, time to finish 9 ply search 2:33, move found after 9ply search Nxg2 28mb hash, time to finish 9 ply search 1:49, move found after 9ply search Nf5 60mb hash, time to finish 9 ply search 2:35, move found after 9ply search Nxg2 Rebel 8 running under windows. PII 400
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.