Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: A beauty prize should NOT have any blunder !

Author: Jorge Pichard

Date: 02:15:54 03/11/03

A beauty prize should NOT have any  blunder, and should be considered a beauty
only on the merit of being a hard fought game, where forceful combinative play
and originality are the main ingredient. This indeed was an insult to the
greatest genius of all times in chess.

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=851

Re: A beauty prize should NOT have any blunder ! Telmo Escobar 20:08:39 03/11/03
Re: A beauty prize should NOT have any blunder ! Alastair Scott 11:05:18 03/11/03
Re: Sorry, case study Kasparov! Rolf Tueschen 04:19:05 03/11/03
- FISCHER IS A CHESS LEGEND, GK ONLY A CHESSPLAYER Carlos Lantigua 22:22:29 03/11/03
Re: A beauty prize should NOT have any blunder ! Mike Byrne 02:46:04 03/11/03
- Re: A beauty prize should NOT have any blunder ! Sally Weltrop 07:37:48 03/11/03
  - Re: A beauty prize should NOT have any blunder ! Mogens Larsen 07:47:24 03/11/03
    - Re: A beauty prize should NOT have any blunder ! Marc van Hal 00:58:39 03/12/03
      - Re: A beauty prize should NOT have any blunder ! Gabor Szots 05:44:24 03/12/03
        
        Re: A beauty prize should NOT have any blunder ! Marc van Hal 14:57:35 03/12/03
    - Re: A beauty prize should NOT have any blunder ! Sune Fischer 11:03:45 03/11/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.