Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 11:38:25 03/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 11, 2003 at 14:33:37, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 11, 2003 at 14:10:26, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>On March 11, 2003 at 13:08:01, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On March 11, 2003 at 05:56:08, Peter Berger wrote: >>> >>>>On March 10, 2003 at 13:44:12, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>On March 10, 2003 at 12:17:36, Peter Berger wrote: >>>>> >>>>>I did not look at the games but using a computer does not mean to play >>>>>computer moves. >>>>> >>>>>Computers can be used for analysis of positions that is not on the board >>>>>and I think that giving computer hours to analyze when you sleep may give more >>>>>information so it is better than nothing. >>>>> >>>>>I tend to believe that the top players do everything to help them and it >>>>>includes using computers. >>>>> >>>> >>>>I agree - it seems corresponcence chess is a dying sport. In maybe 10 years due >>>>to advances in hardware (and software, too) chessprograms will be virtually >>>>unbeatable. At this time top level correspondence chess will most likely be a >>>>battle of clever computer operators. >> >>Humans with the help of computers (not vice versa) will be clearly stronger than >>all computerprograms in 10 years too. >>Do you understand anything about Analysing with a computer? >>Do you know how deep one can get in a typical middlegame position? >>Especially if you know from experience which moves the computer oppponents >>prefer. >>Do you know what ply 20,30,40 really means? >>I hope so, but I have doubts when I read your statements. >>Artificial intelligence or Quantum computers are "necessary" to play (almost for >>AI) perfect chess. Not in the next 10 years of course. >> >>Michael > >You may be right if you assume only hardware progress but >I think that you underestimate the possible progress in software that can >be done. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.