Author: Carlos Lantigua
Date: 22:22:29 03/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 11, 2003 at 07:19:05, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On March 11, 2003 at 05:15:54, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>A beauty prize should NOT have any blunder, and should be considered a beauty >>only on the merit of being a hard fought game, where forceful combinative play >>and originality are the main ingredient. This indeed was an insult to the >>greatest genius of all times in chess. > >First of all this is complete nonsense! > >1) There is no official definition of a beauty prize! > >2) Therefore such a prize has a "social" implementation in an event. > >3) This time the prize was somewhat a "recompensation" for a brilliant stamina >which is not the same as brilliant, correct chess. Comensation for the kid who >came in last. Not the worst example for consolation! > >4) But Kasparov, the Autist, is incapable of feeling such implementations, such >implications, in short, in reality he, Kasparov, is the KID, not Radjaboj. Both >had their mama at hand, yes, but Kasparov is 40 and the youngster is just >turning 15 to 16!!! > >5) Now let's analyse the real scandal. Was it that K. was offended and shouted >to the invited and journalists? No. The real scandal is something else! And it >has almost psychiatric dimensions. Beyond the chess ranking Kasparov has the >same rights, human rights, like all the rest of the people. The rest of the >people have their own right independent of Kasparov. But, and that is the point, >Kasparov is seeing himself as the center of interest, as if the whole event is >only organized to his benefit. More, all the other people are only there to >please him and his mommy. He is God and all others useful idiots each one on his >functional place. But that other people have their own reality and a reality >that could be well above the one of a Kasparov, all this is unknown to the chess >genius. > >6) Frederic Friedel one of those important persons, who probably assisted in the >early development of Kasparov in the West as the spoilt gourmet child, writes: >"Instead, the fact that he was essentially correct in his allegations will be >lost amid the accusations that he is a sore loser. We knew that already, >however, and even have a certain degree of admiration for Kasparov's childlike >emotional honesty. There is no spin, no false smile." >This is completely false and only shows how Fred is himself a child in questions >of educastion and psychology. Psychopathology is the field that comes to mind >when someone acts like mad only because he has a point to make which in itself >has certain good reasons. But does that alow public amoking? Exactly the gaffe >without self-control or worse with the egoistic misjudment of the whole >situation, that is a pathologic fact. Friedel, the lay psychologist, sees >childlike honesty in madness. Of course that is only working if the whole event >is seen through the eyes of Kasparov. The child always say "I, I will have, no, >better, I must have". And this should be honest if expressed by a 40 year old >man-kid with mommy near-by? No way! >And also, he was essentially correct with his allegations? No way! He didn't >even understand why Radjaboj got the prize. Perhaps for the same reasons his >unconscousness told him to lose against the kid after he had sacked those >million dollars for literally nothing! > >7) And Jorge, I always thought Jorge could be a good pseudonym for Freddy, >speaks of the greatest chess genius of all times. What a mistake! No one ever >can touch the heights of Bobby Fischer. Note well! Bobby did not play with >mommy. He could already go to the loo on his own when he was 16 and >participating in the Wch circus. Also in his chess Bobby was all alone on >himself. He did it all on his own while Garry had the great Soviet support >machine. Nothing bad against the trainer system in the former USSR. But Bobby >must be regarded as the greater genius because he did it all on his own. So, >this repetition of nonsense does not become true also if posted on a daily base. >Not Kasparov, but Bobby Fischer is the greatest chess genius of all times. And >let's wait a couple of years, then we will see that also Karpov is above >Kasparov! Kramnik and younger players might show their height, so that Kasparov >could be forgotten. > >8) Ok, I dare it. If Judit Polgar is so good because she's a woman in the male >circus, then Kasparov is so successful because his opponents are distracted by >the madness in his habits. Perhaps it's a subconscious compassion with the >Autist. > > >Rolf Tueschen > >> >>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=851
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.