Author: Thomas Mayer
Date: 17:09:10 03/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Mike, >> If there someone? Who could confirm this therory? >> Deep<9> = Pepiti 1,59? >> see also: >> http://f11.parsimony.net/forum16635/messages/44732.htm > That would not surprise me. Denis Grafen asked for my crafty code mods. I > remembered he "wrote" Deep <9> , so I said "sure, you send me what you have > and I will send you what I have". Naturally, I did not hear from him again. > I think he should be banned from computer tournaments for 5 years if the > allegations are true, which I do not know are true personally. Well, I think 5 years is not enough... -> tomorrow I will publish the truth about it. In fact he just changes some text-infos in Pepito 1.59 and that's it. I found in the engine the same bugs then Pepito had, the same set of commands in console mode, the same board representation and when analyzing a position with same settings the same number of nodes, the same eval and the same pv... which can be reproduced with any position you may try. Yesterday I got another version of this crap where he changed some text output and some other things... (he changed e.g. the config file commands but his own config file was wrong so that it does not read correct pawn hash and egtb-cache values...) Maybe he has changed one eval parameter, because the node count differs now by 1-2% - anyway the pv stays nearly the same to Pepito 1.59 and the score still is equal... so the node change might be also a consequence of the different hash settings... To me it is more then 100% proven that it is an absolute clone - and the man behind it ... oh well, I have no words for such persons... Greets, Thomas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.