Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 04:29:49 03/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 14, 2003 at 07:17:19, Mike Byrne wrote: >On March 14, 2003 at 06:44:06, Juan Pablo Naar wrote: > >>On March 14, 2003 at 06:30:27, Matthias Gemuh wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>>>There are lots of TSCP modifications where the author never gave Tom credit. >>>>>That sort of move I credit to sheer ignorance, since you are not going to have a >>>>>world beater without a major surgery and a good deal of understanding of how a >>>>>chess program should work. >>> >>> >>>Hi Dann, >>> >>>Cloning weak TSCP and improving it is very different from cloning a "finished" >>>giant. Tom should then be given due credit, anyway. >>> >>>/Matthias. >> >>Hi all, >> >>Deep 9 engine is just a clone like many others, I have a big list of clones, >>here is: >> >>Bionic Impakt- Crafty Clone >> >>LaPetite 1.0- Crafty Clone >> >>Crafty Matrix- Crafty Clone >> >>Alex- TSCP Clone >> >>MSCP- TSCP Clone >> >>Ruffian 1.0.1- ??? Clone, some say fritz, some say crafty, but i say is an >>hiarcs 732 clone >> >>Deep Sjeng 1.0- Clone of Sjeng 12.13, but is the same author. >> >>Comet- GNU Chess Clone >> >>Crafty- Cray Blitz Clone > >Crafty = Cray Blitz clone ? > >You no idea what you're talking about, other than the fact it is the same >author. Sure, it is a descendant of Cray Blitz, but that's different. That's >like calling YOU a clone of "Adam" from "Adam and Eve".. Actually it is like calling him a clone of himself from a few years back :) Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.