Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Deep 9 incident

Author: José Carlos

Date: 05:25:00 03/14/03

Go up one level in this thread

On March 14, 2003 at 06:30:27, Matthias Gemuh wrote:

>
>
>>>There are lots of TSCP modifications where the author never gave Tom credit.
>>>That sort of move I credit to sheer ignorance, since you are not going to have a
>>>world beater without a major surgery and a good deal of understanding of how a
>>>chess program should work.
>
>
>Hi Dann,
>
>Cloning weak TSCP and improving it is very different from cloning a "finished"
>giant.

  I'm afraid I disagree. Cloning is cloning, no matter how strong the cloned
program is. Well, I'm speaking from a moral point of view. From a legal point of
view, it might be different in the same sense that it's different to steal 1
euro than to steal 1 million, thought it is debatable in our context.

  José C.


>Tom should then be given due credit, anyway.
>
>/Matthias.

• Re: Deep 9 incident Matthias Gemuh 05:44:57 03/14/03
  • TSCP clones, e.g., Squash & Josh Haglund Tom Kerrigan 11:53:12 03/14/03
    • Re: TSCP clones, e.g., Squash & Josh Haglund Matthias Gemuh 12:41:25 03/14/03
    • Re: TSCP clones, e.g., Squash & Josh Haglund Dann Corbit 12:11:57 03/14/03
      • Re: TSCP clones, e.g., Squash & Josh Haglund J F 04:09:14 03/15/03
        • Re: TSCP clones, e.g., Squash & Josh Haglund Thomas Mayer 07:37:29 03/15/03
  • Re: Deep 9 incident José Carlos 06:18:38 03/14/03
    • Re: Deep 9 incident Dann Corbit 10:13:48 03/14/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.