Author: Juan Pablo Naar
Date: 10:55:07 03/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 14, 2003 at 06:53:33, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On March 14, 2003 at 06:44:06, Juan Pablo Naar wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>Deep 9 engine is just a clone like many others, I have a big list of clones, >>here is: >> >>Bionic Impakt- Crafty Clone >> >>LaPetite 1.0- Crafty Clone >> >>Crafty Matrix- Crafty Clone >> >>Alex- TSCP Clone >> >>MSCP- TSCP Clone >> >>Ruffian 1.0.1- ??? Clone, some say fritz, some say crafty, but i say is an >>hiarcs 732 clone > >Don't post allogations without a shred of proof. > >>Comet- GNU Chess Clone > >If Comet still constitutes a clone of GNU Chess your list needs to be expanded >somewhat. Your definition of a clone isn't valid IMO. > >>Crafty- Cray Blitz Clone > >Oh dear, oh dear. > >>Deep 9: Pepito 1.59 Clone > >and also > >Siborney: Pepito clone. > >Regards, >Mogens Hi, Ok, ok, i thought that a clone was an engine that is created from another's source code. Tell me if im right or wrong. If what I say about what is a clone is true, comet is a MUCH IMPROVED ENGINE THAT CAME OUT FROM GNU CHESS, the eval, s.s, and other important things were changed on the GNU Chess source code and thats where Comet born, Im I wrong? About Ruffian, the development started on 1998!! so the engine MUST be a clone, as I explained on my list, the real origin of Ruffian is unknown, but some say it is a fritz, or crafty, or hiarcs, but that is not prooven completely. About MSCP, I tested like 500 games between them and almost all were draw, so I think that MSCP is a TSCP Clone. I cant put EXChess-TSCP a clone because I havent tested them yet, so I cant say anything about them. Also, i forgot to put this clone: DelphiMax- MiniMax clone, Matin Bauer say that to me and it appears on its homepage so you CANT disscuss about that one. Regards, Juan Pablo Naar
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.