Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 14:31:35 03/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 14, 2003 at 07:29:49, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >On March 14, 2003 at 07:17:19, Mike Byrne wrote: > >>On March 14, 2003 at 06:44:06, Juan Pablo Naar wrote: >> >>>On March 14, 2003 at 06:30:27, Matthias Gemuh wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>There are lots of TSCP modifications where the author never gave Tom credit. >>>>>>That sort of move I credit to sheer ignorance, since you are not going to have a >>>>>>world beater without a major surgery and a good deal of understanding of how a >>>>>>chess program should work. >>>> >>>> >>>>Hi Dann, >>>> >>>>Cloning weak TSCP and improving it is very different from cloning a "finished" >>>>giant. Tom should then be given due credit, anyway. >>>> >>>>/Matthias. >>> >>>Hi all, >>> >>>Deep 9 engine is just a clone like many others, I have a big list of clones, >>>here is: >>> >>>Bionic Impakt- Crafty Clone >>> >>>LaPetite 1.0- Crafty Clone >>> >>>Crafty Matrix- Crafty Clone >>> >>>Alex- TSCP Clone >>> >>>MSCP- TSCP Clone >>> >>>Ruffian 1.0.1- ??? Clone, some say fritz, some say crafty, but i say is an >>>hiarcs 732 clone >>> >>>Deep Sjeng 1.0- Clone of Sjeng 12.13, but is the same author. >>> >>>Comet- GNU Chess Clone >>> >>>Crafty- Cray Blitz Clone >> >>Crafty = Cray Blitz clone ? >> >>You no idea what you're talking about, other than the fact it is the same >>author. Sure, it is a descendant of Cray Blitz, but that's different. That's >>like calling YOU a clone of "Adam" from "Adam and Eve".. > > >Actually it is like calling him a clone of himself from a few years back :) > >Regards >Jonas :) Good one ...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.