Author: Andrew Williams
Date: 14:37:07 03/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 14, 2003 at 13:55:07, Juan Pablo Naar wrote: >On March 14, 2003 at 06:53:33, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On March 14, 2003 at 06:44:06, Juan Pablo Naar wrote: >> >>>Hi all, >>> >>>Deep 9 engine is just a clone like many others, I have a big list of clones, >>>here is: >>> >>>Bionic Impakt- Crafty Clone >>> >>>LaPetite 1.0- Crafty Clone >>> >>>Crafty Matrix- Crafty Clone >>> >>>Alex- TSCP Clone >>> >>>MSCP- TSCP Clone >>> >>>Ruffian 1.0.1- ??? Clone, some say fritz, some say crafty, but i say is an >>>hiarcs 732 clone >> >>Don't post allogations without a shred of proof. >> >>>Comet- GNU Chess Clone >> >>If Comet still constitutes a clone of GNU Chess your list needs to be expanded >>somewhat. Your definition of a clone isn't valid IMO. >> >>>Crafty- Cray Blitz Clone >> >>Oh dear, oh dear. >> >>>Deep 9: Pepito 1.59 Clone >> >>and also >> >>Siborney: Pepito clone. >> >>Regards, >>Mogens > [snip] > .... About Ruffian, the development started on >1998!! so the engine MUST be a clone, as I explained on my list, the real origin >of Ruffian is unknown, but some say it is a fritz, or crafty, or hiarcs, but >that is not prooven completely. About MSCP, I tested like 500 games between them Why "MUST" Ruffian be a clone if it was started in 1998?? Ruffian isn't a clone. Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.