Author: Jason Waugh
Date: 16:53:10 03/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
I'll contribute what I can, for what it's worth: Using the test position posted.... Chess Tiger 15 (Palm Tungsten T, 1.5MB HT) - 390 NPS Chess Tiger 15 (Pentium II 400MHz w/Win2K, 384MB RAM, 96MB HT} - 82,000 NPS On the Tungsten T, CT15 runs under PACE and runs at the same speed as it does on a 33MHz palm device. This isn't just "the word on the street" - I can vouch for this, as TigerMark (CT's built in benchmark) displayed the same score on my m505 as it does on my Tungsten. I cannot test overclocking since I no longer have my m505. When we can see how well it runs with some ARM code depends on Christophe. ;) Since similar engines are not available for Pocket PC and Palm, then the comparison can't exactly be scientific - but if it helps, I tested that position on my PC with Ruffian (96MB HT) and achieved 185,500 NPS (hmmn, interestingly enough, despite the fact that Ruffian was more than "twice as fast" - CT15 was well into 14 ply depth before the minute was up, Ruffian only in the middle of 12. Mind you, that doesn't necessarily mean anything either.) Jason.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.