Author: Albert Bertilsson
Date: 03:47:17 03/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 17, 2003 at 06:43:30, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 17, 2003 at 05:47:29, Albert Bertilsson wrote: > >>Hi! >> >>Since Uri pointed out that my PV was rotten I fixed that to see what happens. >> >>I picked out all 105 positions that failed when running for 5 seconds and >>increased the time to 60 seconds. >> >>The results was quite nice, some 40 positions where solved! > >still 65 unsolved positions are a lot. > >Movei can solve 275 out of 300 in less than a second. > >Movei needs something between 0.1 and 0.2 seconds on my A1000 to get 65 unsolved >positions. > >Do you use history tables and killer moves for better order of moves? >Do you use MVV/LVA or some more logical way to order captures? > > >Uri Ok, so I'll go out on the bug hunt! Sharper uses MVV/LVA to order captures. I've tested killer moves but it only gave 1-2% less nodes, maybe I did it wrong!? I'm currently testing history tables and it seems to give me about 5% less nodes, maybe I got that one wrong too!? /Regards Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.