Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess !

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 10:26:46 03/17/03

On March 17, 2003 at 06:43:53, Jorge Pichard wrote:

>On March 16, 2003 at 21:03:07, Jason Kasick wrote:
>
>>Anyone heard of Polywell computers, namely the ones with the AMD 2500 chips?
>
>Since for Chess the CPU is what really count, here is an economical PC.
>
>http://computers.cnet.com/hardware/0-1018-404-20837925.html?tag=txt

the CPU is not the _only_ thing to look at.  Memory bandwidth is another.  A
machine
with a MB that supports interleaved memory will be somewhat faster, but
generally somewhat
more expensive as well.  There are other issues too, of course.

Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Tom Kerrigan 11:34:49 03/17/03
- Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 13:13:11 03/17/03
  - Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Tom Kerrigan 13:57:28 03/17/03
    - Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 20:58:53 03/17/03
- Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Randall Shane 12:23:02 03/17/03
  - Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Tom Kerrigan 12:42:23 03/17/03
    - Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Eugene Nalimov 15:47:27 03/17/03
      - Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Aaron Gordon 19:59:30 03/17/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 21:01:44 03/17/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Matt Taylor 04:38:39 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 07:04:56 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Tom Kerrigan 09:56:03 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 13:37:35 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Tom Kerrigan 14:46:10 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 15:20:14 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Tom Kerrigan 16:45:43 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 20:09:08 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Tom Kerrigan 19:50:43 03/19/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 20:32:42 03/19/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Matt Taylor 09:53:42 03/19/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 10:52:31 03/19/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Matt Taylor 12:58:37 03/19/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 14:29:58 03/19/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 14:35:08 03/19/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Matt Taylor 17:49:24 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Tom Kerrigan 19:47:51 03/19/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Matt Taylor 23:42:54 03/19/03
        
        65.3ns :) Aaron Gordon 00:38:14 03/20/03
        
        Re: 65.3ns :) Robert Hyatt 07:48:21 03/20/03
        
        Re: 65.3ns :) Aaron Gordon 08:16:57 03/20/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Jeremiah Penery 17:22:33 03/18/03
        
        Some latency data and a challenge Robert Hyatt 23:14:35 03/18/03
        
        Re: Some latency data and a challenge (how to do this) Robert Hyatt 08:32:05 03/19/03
        
        How's 66.2ns? ;) Aaron Gordon 08:41:01 03/19/03
        
        Re: How's 66.2ns? ;) Robert Hyatt 10:55:12 03/19/03
        
        Re: How's 66.2ns? ;) Tom Kerrigan 19:42:09 03/19/03
        
        Re: How's 66.2ns? ;) Robert Hyatt 19:52:40 03/19/03
        
        Re: How's 66.2ns? ;) Aaron Gordon 11:17:52 03/19/03
        
        Re: How's 66.2ns? ;) Robert Hyatt 11:24:46 03/19/03
        
        Re: How's 66.2ns? ;) Aaron Gordon 12:02:54 03/19/03
        
        Re: How's 66.2ns? ;) Robert Hyatt 12:39:39 03/19/03
        
        Re: How's 66.2ns? ;) Aaron Gordon 12:57:32 03/19/03
        
        Re: How's 66.2ns? ;) Robert Hyatt 19:49:15 03/19/03
        
        Final Results Aaron Gordon 10:21:17 03/19/03
        
        Re: Final Results Aaron Gordon 11:01:56 03/19/03
        
        1 more result Aaron Gordon 10:39:16 03/19/03
        
        Re: 1 more result Robert Hyatt 10:58:01 03/19/03
        
        Result file(s) for download Aaron Gordon 08:46:46 03/19/03
        
        Final result file(s) for download Aaron Gordon 10:48:38 03/19/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 20:11:35 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Matt Taylor 09:58:07 03/19/03
        
        lmbench on nForce 2 w/AthlonXP 2500 Matt Taylor 23:00:25 03/19/03
        
        Re: lmbench on nForce 2 w/AthlonXP 2500 Aaron Gordon 23:13:51 03/19/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 11:04:27 03/19/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Matt Taylor 13:04:04 03/19/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 19:55:41 03/19/03
        
        Re: 88.86 ns on a Dual Xeon 2.8/533 ScienceMark 2.0 beta Frederic Louguet 03:58:18 03/20/03
        
        Re: 88.86 ns on a Dual Xeon 2.8/533 ScienceMark 2.0 beta Ian Kennedy 23:47:17 03/21/03
        
        Re: 88.86 ns on a Dual Xeon 2.8/533 ScienceMark 2.0 beta Vincent Diepeveen 12:21:37 03/22/03
        
        Re: 88.86 ns on a Dual Xeon 2.8/533 ScienceMark 2.0 beta Robert Hyatt 07:45:33 03/20/03
        
        Re: 88.86 ns on a Dual Xeon 2.8/533 ScienceMark 2.0 beta Matt Taylor 09:11:11 03/20/03
        
        Re: 88.86 ns on a Dual Xeon 2.8/533 ScienceMark 2.0 beta Robert Hyatt 10:14:38 03/20/03
        
        Re: 88.86 ns on a Dual Xeon 2.8/533 ScienceMark 2.0 beta Matt Taylor 15:39:21 03/20/03
        
        Re: 88.86 ns on a Dual Xeon 2.8/533 ScienceMark 2.0 beta Matt Taylor 15:20:22 03/21/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Matt Taylor 09:29:06 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! enrico carrisco 01:46:33 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 07:11:38 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Aaron Gordon 21:24:01 03/17/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 07:12:56 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Aaron Gordon 12:42:56 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 13:41:03 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Matt Taylor 18:32:16 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 20:18:15 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Matt Taylor 09:46:15 03/19/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Aaron Gordon 14:02:22 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 15:22:57 03/18/03
        
        Interleaved test results here Aaron Gordon 17:07:13 03/18/03
        
        Re: Interleaved test results here Robert Hyatt 20:22:33 03/18/03
        
        Re: Interleaved test results here Matt Taylor 09:32:09 03/19/03
        
        Re: Interleaved test results here Robert Hyatt 11:13:02 03/19/03
        
        So why does Itanic get faster w/ more cache? Tom Kerrigan 17:33:46 03/18/03
        
        Re: So why does Itanic get faster w/ more cache? Eugene Nalimov 11:29:55 03/19/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Tom Kerrigan 14:13:13 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 15:25:45 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Tom Kerrigan 16:49:17 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 20:26:10 03/18/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Matt Taylor 09:20:19 03/19/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 11:10:25 03/19/03
        
        Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Matt Taylor 13:22:55 03/19/03
      - Thanks Eugene (nt) Tom Kerrigan 16:13:57 03/17/03
Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Matthew Hull 11:24:36 03/17/03
- Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 13:16:06 03/17/03
  - Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Matthew White 13:24:12 03/17/03
    - Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 08:52:28 03/18/03

This page took 0.04 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.