Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess !

Author: Jeremiah Penery

Date: 17:22:33 03/18/03

This exact discussion has taken place here at least twice before.  I'm not sure
why Bob persists with his 120ns number, but no amount of convincing or data is
going to change his mind.

Some latency data and a challenge Robert Hyatt 23:14:35 03/18/03
- Re: Some latency data and a challenge (how to do this) Robert Hyatt 08:32:05 03/19/03
  - How's 66.2ns? ;) Aaron Gordon 08:41:01 03/19/03
    - Re: How's 66.2ns? ;) Robert Hyatt 10:55:12 03/19/03
      - Re: How's 66.2ns? ;) Tom Kerrigan 19:42:09 03/19/03
        
        Re: How's 66.2ns? ;) Robert Hyatt 19:52:40 03/19/03
      - Re: How's 66.2ns? ;) Aaron Gordon 11:17:52 03/19/03
        
        Re: How's 66.2ns? ;) Robert Hyatt 11:24:46 03/19/03
        
        Re: How's 66.2ns? ;) Aaron Gordon 12:02:54 03/19/03
        
        Re: How's 66.2ns? ;) Robert Hyatt 12:39:39 03/19/03
        
        Re: How's 66.2ns? ;) Aaron Gordon 12:57:32 03/19/03
        
        Re: How's 66.2ns? ;) Robert Hyatt 19:49:15 03/19/03
    - Final Results Aaron Gordon 10:21:17 03/19/03
      - Re: Final Results Aaron Gordon 11:01:56 03/19/03
      - 1 more result Aaron Gordon 10:39:16 03/19/03
        
        Re: 1 more result Robert Hyatt 10:58:01 03/19/03
    - Result file(s) for download Aaron Gordon 08:46:46 03/19/03
      - Final result file(s) for download Aaron Gordon 10:48:38 03/19/03
Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 20:11:35 03/18/03
- Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Matt Taylor 09:58:07 03/19/03
  - lmbench on nForce 2 w/AthlonXP 2500 Matt Taylor 23:00:25 03/19/03
    - Re: lmbench on nForce 2 w/AthlonXP 2500 Aaron Gordon 23:13:51 03/19/03
  - Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 11:04:27 03/19/03
    - Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Matt Taylor 13:04:04 03/19/03
      - Re: Since the CPU is what really count for Chess ! Robert Hyatt 19:55:41 03/19/03
        
        Re: 88.86 ns on a Dual Xeon 2.8/533 ScienceMark 2.0 beta Frederic Louguet 03:58:18 03/20/03
        
        Re: 88.86 ns on a Dual Xeon 2.8/533 ScienceMark 2.0 beta Ian Kennedy 23:47:17 03/21/03
        
        Re: 88.86 ns on a Dual Xeon 2.8/533 ScienceMark 2.0 beta Vincent Diepeveen 12:21:37 03/22/03
        
        Re: 88.86 ns on a Dual Xeon 2.8/533 ScienceMark 2.0 beta Robert Hyatt 07:45:33 03/20/03
        
        Re: 88.86 ns on a Dual Xeon 2.8/533 ScienceMark 2.0 beta Matt Taylor 09:11:11 03/20/03
        
        Re: 88.86 ns on a Dual Xeon 2.8/533 ScienceMark 2.0 beta Robert Hyatt 10:14:38 03/20/03
        
        Re: 88.86 ns on a Dual Xeon 2.8/533 ScienceMark 2.0 beta Matt Taylor 15:39:21 03/20/03
        
        Re: 88.86 ns on a Dual Xeon 2.8/533 ScienceMark 2.0 beta Matt Taylor 15:20:22 03/21/03

This page took 0.43 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.