Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:11:35 03/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 18, 2003 at 20:22:33, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >This exact discussion has taken place here at least twice before. I'm not sure >why Bob persists with his 120ns number, but no amount of convincing or data is >going to change his mind. Would you care to post some _exact_ data that disproves 120ns? Did you see Matt's number in the post parallel to yours? Using current DDR ram speeds? So your "no amount of convincing" leaves me cold. "no amount of data" has yet been presented to show any machine with < 100ns latency. Feel free to disprove it but post your code. Any old sloppy C code won't do, the code has to be written to test latency, not prefetching or cache reuse.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.