Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: False draw claim?

Author: Ricardo Gibert

Date: 10:23:17 03/19/03

Go up one level in this thread


On March 19, 2003 at 12:09:01, Bas Hamstra wrote:

>What is the official rule: as far as I know whenever the same position has
>actually occurred three times on the board, you can claim a draw. Is it required
>that the color to move is also the same?
>
>Best regards,
>Bas.


There are 2 distinct cases that need to be differentiated:
(1) Your *opponent* was the one that made the moves that repeated the position.
(2) *You* were the one that made the moves that repeated the position.

Note that there many very experienced players that are unaware there are these 2
distinct cases including some tournament directors I've encountered.

IMPORTANT: In both cases, the only time you can make a draw claim is when it is
*your* turn to move.

In case (1), your draw claim is valid only if the position has "properly"
repeated at least three times *and* the position *on the board* is one of them.

In case (2), your draw claim is valid only if the position has "properly" (see
below for an explanation) repeated at least two times *and* you can indicate a
legal move, but do *not* play the move that would represent a third repetition.
If you play the move, even though the position has thereby been repeated three
or more times, your claim is invalid, because it is not *your* turn to move.
Your opponent however can make a claim (his option to do so), but in accordance
with case (1) rather than case (2).

Note that a situation can occur such that a valid claim on your turn to move can
be valid in accordance with *either* cases (1) or (2). They are not necessarily
mutually exclusive possibilities. To be clear, it can happen on your move that:
- Neither case is valid.
- Only case (1) is valid.
- Only case (2) is valid.
- Either case (1) or case (2) is valid.
In a tournament, it can happen that you will get a director rules against your
draw claim in accordance with one of the cases and the other case is overlooked.
Even directors get confused. It is important to understand the 2 distinct cases
to avoid getting screwed.

A position is "properly" repeated when the following three conditions are
fulfilled:
(1) The turn to move is the same in each repeated position.
(2) The potential abilty to castle K-side and Q-side is the same in each
repeated position for *both* players.
(3) The legal moves available in each of the repeated positions is the same. In
this regard, it should not be overlooked that the availability of en passant can
adversely affect a claim.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.