Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 10:58:01 03/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 19, 2003 at 13:39:16, Aaron Gordon wrote: >This one is of my Dual Celeron machine. Two Celeron 400's at 498MHz, 83MHz bus, >regular SDRAM, 440BX chipset... > >Memory latencies in nanoseconds - smaller is better > (WARNING - may not be correct, check graphs) >------------------------------------------------------------------ >Host OS Mhz L1 $ L2 $ Main mem Guesses >--------- ------------- --- ---- ---- -------- ------- >c690715-c Linux 2.2.16- 498 6.0260 98.8 148.7 > > >By far the slowest latency out of my machines (148.7ns). That is almost exactly the speed I get for all of our dual xeons, my 2.8 is at 151ns, the 3.06s are at 148ns. I'm still running tests, but note that I am using factory settings only and not pushing the clock speed anywhere. So far the best I have found is a couple of machines with SDRAM at 130-131ns, the slowest are the DDR ram machines here that are single and dual PIVs at 2.4-3.06ghz.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.